Triple
T23718398
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Beats Studio Buds |
E586072
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasChargingCase |
P153683
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Beats Studio Buds, hasChargingCase, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasChargingCase Context triple: [Beats Studio Buds, hasChargingCase, yes]
-
A.
supportsChargingMethod
Indicates that one entity is compatible with and can operate using a specified charging method.
-
B.
requiresCharging
Indicates that an entity depends on being recharged (e.g., with electrical power or energy) in order to function or continue operating.
-
C.
supportsChargingModel
Indicates that one entity is compatible with, or able to operate under, a specified charging or billing model.
-
D.
supportsWirelessCharging
Indicates that one entity provides the capability for another entity to be charged without a physical wired connection, typically via inductive or similar wireless power transfer methods.
-
E.
hasHolderCharacteristic
Indicates that a holder (such as an owner, container, or bearer) possesses or exhibits a particular characteristic or attribute.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24906fb108190a6898751e46bdc11 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1b77d121c8190892d3f8ef3f3156f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:47 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f155e4b1148190836ede4741dcb888 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:50 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f15b453da88190889a8d9b21727958 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 1:13 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:59 p.m.