Triple

T2371786
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Oregon unclaimed property program E46104 entity
Predicate dataMaintained P37873 FINISHED
Object owner names LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: owner names | Statement: [Oregon unclaimed property program, dataMaintained, owner names]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dataMaintained
Context triple: [Oregon unclaimed property program, dataMaintained, owner names]
  • A. maintainedAt
    Indicates that an entity is kept in proper working order, condition, or status at a particular place, time, or context.
  • B. databaseMaintainedBy
    Indicates that a particular database is operated, managed, or kept up-to-date by a specified agent or organization.
  • C. maintainedFor
    Indicates that something is kept in a particular state, condition, or operation for the benefit, use, or purpose of another entity.
  • D. maintainedAs
    Indicates that one entity is kept in a particular state, condition, or configuration by another entity through ongoing care, management, or support.
  • E. maintainedWithin
    Indicates that one entity is kept, preserved, or sustained inside the boundaries or context of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88a145268819083e2736cb835c696 completed March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc771302481908540e31abb5aeeba completed March 7, 2026, 6:36 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abc59b88348190a2d6c08f69974117 completed March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abc6443c6c8190b932de2abd8eb28f completed March 7, 2026, 6:31 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:56 p.m.