Triple
T23687691
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lewis base |
E585212
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayNotBe |
P39890
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Brønsted–Lowry base |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Brønsted–Lowry base | Statement: [Lewis base, mayNotBe, Brønsted–Lowry base]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayNotBe Context triple: [Lewis base, mayNotBe, Brønsted–Lowry base]
-
A.
mayNot
chosen
Indicates that an entity is not permitted or is prohibited from performing a particular action or entering into a specified relationship.
-
B.
mayNotReduce
Indicates that one entity is prohibited from decreasing, diminishing, or lowering some quantity, quality, or resource associated with another entity.
-
C.
mayReject
Indicates that one entity has the authority or option to refuse, decline, or not accept another entity or proposal.
-
D.
mayResultIn
Indicates that one entity has the potential to cause, lead to, or bring about another entity or outcome, without guaranteeing that it will occur.
-
E.
mayPass
Indicates that one entity is permitted or authorized to move through, cross, or gain access to another entity or location.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e249037ce0819088b149608e98f685 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1b5bfe15c8190af2b4c451bccae16 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:39 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f155d5265881908e43a9696b6a6d0f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 12:50 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:52 p.m.