Triple

T23687678
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lewis base E585212 entity
Predicate hasElectronPair P153385 FINISHED
Object lone pair LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lone pair | Statement: [Lewis base, hasElectronPair, lone pair]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasElectronPair
Context triple: [Lewis base, hasElectronPair, lone pair]
  • A. hasElectronConfiguration
    Indicates that an entity (typically an atom or ion) possesses a specific arrangement of electrons in its atomic orbitals.
  • B. electronCount
    Indicates the number of electrons associated with a given entity (such as an atom, ion, or molecule) in the described context.
  • C. hasApproximateElectronDensity
    Indicates that one entity possesses an electron density value that is close to, but not exactly equal to, that of another entity or reference.
  • D. isPairOf
    Indicates that two entities are associated as a matched or corresponding pair within a defined context.
  • E. hasIsotopicPairWith
    Indicates that two chemical entities are isotopes of each other, differing only in neutron number while sharing the same atomic number.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e249037ce0819088b149608e98f685 completed April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1b5bfe15c8190af2b4c451bccae16 completed April 29, 2026, 7:39 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f155d5265881908e43a9696b6a6d0f completed April 29, 2026, 12:50 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f157cc43a881909ed2d8b0a09b5d73 completed April 29, 2026, 12:58 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:52 p.m.