Triple

T2368593
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Resource Management Act 1991 E46038 entity
Predicate relevantSectionForTreaty P37830 FINISHED
Object section 8 LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: section 8 | Statement: [Resource Management Act 1991, relevantSectionForTreaty, section 8]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relevantSectionForTreaty
Context triple: [Resource Management Act 1991, relevantSectionForTreaty, section 8]
  • A. relatedToTreaty
    Indicates that there exists a connection, association, or relevance between an entity and a specific treaty or treaties.
  • B. linkedToTreaty
    Indicates that an entity has a formal connection or association with a specific treaty, such as being established by, governed by, or otherwise related to that treaty.
  • C. linkedTreaty
    Indicates that there is a formal treaty connection or association between the related entities, such as being parties to, or otherwise bound by, the same treaty.
  • D. treatyScope
    Indicates the range, subject matter, or extent of issues and obligations that a treaty covers or applies to.
  • E. treatyFocus
    Indicates that a treaty is primarily concerned with, directed toward, or centered on a particular subject, issue, or area.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88a145268819083e2736cb835c696 completed March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc76bf75c8190b014c3dbfc46bba3 completed March 7, 2026, 6:36 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abc59b88348190a2d6c08f69974117 completed March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abc6443c6c8190b932de2abd8eb28f completed March 7, 2026, 6:31 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:56 p.m.