Triple
T23669885
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Grand Falls |
E584699
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAmalgamationPartner |
P6600
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Windsor |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Windsor | Statement: [Grand Falls, hasAmalgamationPartner, Windsor]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAmalgamationPartner Context triple: [Grand Falls, hasAmalgamationPartner, Windsor]
-
A.
hasPartnerOrganization
Indicates that an entity is formally associated or collaborates with another entity as a partner organization.
-
B.
hasPartner
Indicates that one entity is in a partner relationship (such as romantic, life, or business partnership) with another entity.
-
C.
mergerPartner
chosen
Indicates that two entities are involved as counterparties in a merger transaction with each other.
-
D.
hasJointVenturePartner
Indicates that an entity is engaged in a joint venture relationship with another entity as a formal business partner.
-
E.
hasCompanionOrganization
Indicates that one organization is associated with another organization that accompanies, supports, or partners it in some related capacity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e24901421881908c17a5293bdd4a8e |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1b40dc0ec8190b558e30dbebf491f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f118dd13008190a8799b4e9cadbd79 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 8:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:50 p.m.