Triple

T23667202
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Itaporanga d’Ajuda E584615 entity
Predicate hasLandscapeInfluence P152913 FINISHED
Object coastal influences LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: coastal influences | Statement: [Itaporanga d’Ajuda, hasLandscapeInfluence, coastal influences]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLandscapeInfluence
Context triple: [Itaporanga d’Ajuda, hasLandscapeInfluence, coastal influences]
  • A. hasLandscapeDesignInfluence
    Indicates that one entity has influenced or shaped the landscape design style, principles, or features of another entity.
  • B. hasLandscapeUse
    Indicates that something is used or intended to be used within a landscape or landscaping context.
  • C. hasLandscapeFeatures
    Indicates that an entity possesses or includes specific landscape-related characteristics or elements.
  • D. hasLandscapeUseHistory
    Indicates that an entity has an associated record or account of how its landscape has been used or managed over time.
  • E. hasLandscapeArchitecturalStyle
    Indicates that something (such as a site or landscape) is designed or characterized according to a particular landscape architectural style.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e24901421881908c17a5293bdd4a8e completed April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1b40c48088190a61e9a73919bace5 completed April 29, 2026, 7:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f118dd13008190a8799b4e9cadbd79 completed April 28, 2026, 8:30 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f121cc494081908c987adfcde89b0e completed April 28, 2026, 9:08 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:50 p.m.