Triple

T2366137
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject W3C Member representative E47383 entity
Predicate mayHoldRole P28456 FINISHED
Object Advisory Committee representative LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Advisory Committee representative | Statement: [W3C Member representative, mayHoldRole, Advisory Committee representative]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayHoldRole
Context triple: [W3C Member representative, mayHoldRole, Advisory Committee representative]
  • A. mayHold
    Indicates that one entity is permitted or allowed to possess, contain, or maintain another entity.
  • B. possibleRole chosen
    Indicates that an entity is capable of or eligible to serve in a particular role or function in a given context.
  • C. supportsRole
    Indicates that one entity provides the necessary functionality, resources, or conditions for another entity to perform or occupy a specific role.
  • D. hasRole
    Indicates that an entity occupies, performs, or is assigned a specific role or function in relation to another entity or context.
  • E. servesRole
    Indicates that one entity performs, fulfills, or occupies a particular function, position, or responsibility in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a88a1a4a6081908645b0f2914521ab completed March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc749f8e0819094144b9dd9db8790 completed March 7, 2026, 6:35 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abc59b88348190a2d6c08f69974117 completed March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:55 p.m.