Triple
T23600023
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation |
E582724
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedToPriorCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida (Oneida I) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida (Oneida I) | Statement: [Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation, relatedToPriorCase, Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida (Oneida I)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatedToPriorCase Context triple: [Sherrill v. Oneida Indian Nation, relatedToPriorCase, Oneida Indian Nation v. County of Oneida (Oneida I)]
-
A.
relatedCase
chosen
Indicates that one legal case is connected or associated with another case, such as through shared facts, parties, issues, or procedural history.
-
B.
caseHoldingRelatedTo
Indicates a relationship where one entity’s holding, ownership, or control is legally or logically associated with a particular case or proceeding.
-
C.
relatedCaseArea
Indicates that one case is associated with, pertains to, or falls within the subject matter or domain of another case area.
-
D.
associatedCourtCase
Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to, or involved in, a particular court case.
-
E.
relatedToClaimOf
Indicates a relationship where something is connected or pertinent to a specific claim or assertion.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e248faa2788190abb1581742daa6aa |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1b0929c548190bb42621d1131d87f |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:17 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f118c96a0081908a8ac98ef7e7e60c |
completed | April 28, 2026, 8:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:43 p.m.