Triple
T23597949
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | FIFA Confederations Cup 1992 |
E582669
|
entity |
| Predicate | otherConfederation |
P152860
|
FINISHED |
| Object | CONMEBOL |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: CONMEBOL | Statement: [FIFA Confederations Cup 1992, otherConfederation, CONMEBOL]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: otherConfederation Context triple: [FIFA Confederations Cup 1992, otherConfederation, CONMEBOL]
-
A.
associatedConfederation
Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked to, belongs to, or is formally connected with a specific confederation.
-
B.
confederation2
Indicates a formal alliance or union in which multiple entities join together under a shared framework while retaining their individual autonomy.
-
C.
associatedConfederationCount
Indicates the number of distinct confederations with which an entity is associated.
-
D.
confederation1
Indicates a relationship where multiple entities join together in a loose alliance or union while retaining their individual autonomy.
-
E.
confederation
Indicates a formal union or alliance between multiple entities that retain their individual autonomy while cooperating under a shared framework or agreement.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e248f9e0a08190814772847003b1ff |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1b091992c819085f8aa6cb91cb76a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:17 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f118c96a0081908a8ac98ef7e7e60c |
completed | April 28, 2026, 8:30 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f121cc494081908c987adfcde89b0e |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:43 p.m.