Triple
T23592063
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Court of the United States (rulemaking under the Rules Enabling Act) |
E582506
|
entity |
| Predicate | furtherClarifiedBy |
P127643
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1988 amendments to the Rules Enabling Act |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1988 amendments to the Rules Enabling Act | Statement: [Supreme Court of the United States (rulemaking under the Rules Enabling Act), furtherClarifiedBy, 1988 amendments to the Rules Enabling Act]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: furtherClarifiedBy Context triple: [Supreme Court of the United States (rulemaking under the Rules Enabling Act), furtherClarifiedBy, 1988 amendments to the Rules Enabling Act]
-
A.
clarifiesThat
Indicates that one entity explains or makes another entity more understandable by removing ambiguity or confusion about it.
-
B.
clarifiedInLaterWorkBy
chosen
Indicates that an earlier work is further explained, refined, or made clearer in a subsequent work by (typically) the same creator.
-
C.
hasClarificationsBy
Indicates that one entity provides additional explanations, details, or disambiguation for another entity.
-
D.
furtherAmendedBy
Indicates that an existing item (such as a document, law, or agreement) is modified again by a subsequent amendment, building on prior changes.
-
E.
laterExplained
Indicates that an earlier event, statement, or situation is clarified or made understandable by information provided at a subsequent time.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e248f9e0a08190814772847003b1ff |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1b08befcc819095e0e6052e6fe787 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:17 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f118c96a0081908a8ac98ef7e7e60c |
completed | April 28, 2026, 8:30 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:42 p.m.