Triple

T23578609
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Clan Seton E582136 entity
Predicate hasHistoricAlliance P19658 FINISHED
Object Clan Gordon NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Clan Gordon | Statement: [Clan Seton, hasHistoricAlliance, Clan Gordon]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasHistoricAlliance
Context triple: [Clan Seton, hasHistoricAlliance, Clan Gordon]
  • A. historicallyAlliedWith chosen
    Indicates that two entities have been political, military, or strategic allies during some period in the past.
  • B. hasHistoricalTieTo
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is historically connected or linked to another through past events, associations, or influences.
  • C. hasHistoricalPolity
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with a political unit or state that existed in the past.
  • D. historicalAlignmentOf
    Indicates a relationship where entities share or are compared based on their positions, roles, or associations within a specific historical context or period.
  • E. hasBrokenAllianceWith
    Indicates that a previously established alliance or partnership between two entities has been ended or violated by at least one of them.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e248f8d8248190acd5aee77f0d1709 completed April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1afd7dbe88190b05ff03f952bf7c3 completed April 29, 2026, 7:14 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f118bcc0b08190b25a8dddfd461a0e completed April 28, 2026, 8:29 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:39 p.m.