Triple
T23578496
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Haut-Poitou AOC |
E582132
|
entity |
| Predicate | secondaryColorProduction |
P36992
|
FINISHED |
| Object | red |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: red | Statement: [Haut-Poitou AOC, secondaryColorProduction, red]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: secondaryColorProduction Context triple: [Haut-Poitou AOC, secondaryColorProduction, red]
-
A.
secondaryColour
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as a secondary or accent color in relation to another entity’s primary color.
-
B.
secondaryPigment
Indicates that one pigment functions as a secondary or supporting color relative to another primary pigment in a given context.
-
C.
secondaryProducts
Indicates that certain entities arise as secondary or byproduct outputs from a primary process, activity, or production.
-
D.
secondaryBranchColor
Indicates the color assigned to a secondary or subordinate branch in relation to a primary branch.
-
E.
secondGenerationProduction
Indicates that the production activity involves a second generation of products, technologies, or processes derived from an earlier initial generation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e248f8d8248190acd5aee77f0d1709 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1afd7dbe88190b05ff03f952bf7c3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f118bcc0b08190b25a8dddfd461a0e |
completed | April 28, 2026, 8:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:39 p.m.