Triple
T23578258
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | This Is for the Players |
E582123
|
entity |
| Predicate | featuresSingingInfluence |
P153248
|
FINISHED |
| Object | R&B |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: R&B | Statement: [This Is for the Players, featuresSingingInfluence, R&B]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: featuresSingingInfluence Context triple: [This Is for the Players, featuresSingingInfluence, R&B]
-
A.
vocalInfluence
Indicates that one entity affects, shapes, or modifies another entity through vocal expression, such as speech, tone, or sound.
-
B.
featuresVocalHarmonyBy
Indicates that the subject work includes vocal harmony performances contributed by the specified artist or group.
-
C.
featuresVocal
Indicates that one entity includes or presents the vocal performance or voice of another entity.
-
D.
featuresVocalist
Indicates that one entity (such as a song, track, or performance) includes another entity serving as a vocalist or featured singer.
-
E.
featuresSongwriter
Indicates that a musical work includes or credits a particular person as its songwriter.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e248f8d8248190acd5aee77f0d1709 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:51 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1afd7dbe88190b05ff03f952bf7c3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f118bcc0b08190b25a8dddfd461a0e |
completed | April 28, 2026, 8:29 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f12760784c8190aaeff002ef31febe |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:32 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:39 p.m.