Triple
T2357395
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Netherlands–United States relations |
E47587
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLegalCooperation |
P38189
|
FINISHED |
| Object | extradition treaty |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: extradition treaty | Statement: [Netherlands–United States relations, hasLegalCooperation, extradition treaty]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLegalCooperation Context triple: [Netherlands–United States relations, hasLegalCooperation, extradition treaty]
-
A.
hasLegalForceIn
Indicates that something (such as a law, regulation, or agreement) is legally valid, binding, and enforceable within a specified jurisdiction or context.
-
B.
hasPoliticalCooperationBody
Indicates the existence of an official body or mechanism through which two or more entities engage in structured political cooperation.
-
C.
servedAsMLATo
Indicates that one entity held the position of Member of the Legislative Assembly (MLA) representing or serving another entity (such as a constituency or jurisdiction).
-
D.
cooperatingState
Indicates that one state collaborates or works jointly with another state toward shared goals or activities.
-
E.
hasLegalForceFrom
Indicates that one legal instrument, decision, or norm derives its binding legal effect or enforceability from another specified source.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88a1b678c8190bce986922ba60ce0 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abc71e0c68819082eebd80721abcc1 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:35 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abc599b92c819093d9e15d4437705d |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abc6a85e2c8190afec217ff29476be |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:33 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:54 p.m.