Triple

T23569082
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jurgen, A Comedy of Justice E580050 entity
Predicate hasObscenityTrial P131473 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Jurgen, A Comedy of Justice, hasObscenityTrial, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasObscenityTrial
Context triple: [Jurgen, A Comedy of Justice, hasObscenityTrial, yes]
  • A. trialHeld chosen
    Indicates that a formal legal proceeding or court trial has taken place regarding a particular case or dispute.
  • B. hasTribunal
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or subject to a specific tribunal, such as a court or adjudicative body, that has authority over its cases or matters.
  • C. perpetratorTrial
    Indicates that a legal trial is conducted to judge the actions or guilt of the identified perpetrator.
  • D. defendantInNotableTrial
    Indicates that an entity served as the defendant in a trial that is considered notable or historically significant.
  • E. hasAllegationsOf
    Indicates that one entity is accused or suspected of engaging in certain actions, behaviors, or misconduct, but without implying that these accusations are proven.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e24601a9108190bc31e83833c980e4 completed April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1afd15ca48190afd119ec1b4a07b2 completed April 29, 2026, 7:14 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f118bcc0b08190b25a8dddfd461a0e completed April 28, 2026, 8:29 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:35 p.m.