Triple

T23566029
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Athenian aristocracy E579371 entity
Predicate retainedPowerIn P38655 FINISHED
Object Areopagus after reforms LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Areopagus after reforms | Statement: [Athenian aristocracy, retainedPowerIn, Areopagus after reforms]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: retainedPowerIn
Context triple: [Athenian aristocracy, retainedPowerIn, Areopagus after reforms]
  • A. maintainsPowerThrough
    Indicates that one entity preserves or secures its authority, control, or dominance by means of another entity or specified mechanism.
  • B. reservesPowerTo chosen
    Indicates that one party retains or explicitly keeps for itself the authority or right to exercise a particular power or function, rather than granting it to others.
  • C. inPowerDuring
    Indicates that an entity holds a position of authority or governance throughout a specified time period.
  • D. regainedPowerIn
    Indicates that an entity has recovered or reestablished its previous level of power, control, or authority within a specified context or domain.
  • E. inPowerSince
    Indicates the point in time from which an entity has continuously held a position of authority or power.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245fe24588190888f3aec8407d8e3 completed April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1af6c2930819090bc2b95725fbf18 completed April 29, 2026, 7:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f118bcc0b08190b25a8dddfd461a0e completed April 28, 2026, 8:29 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:34 p.m.