Triple
T23562246
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Father and Son |
E579272
|
entity |
| Predicate | reRecordingAlbum |
P151096
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tea for the Tillerman² |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tea for the Tillerman² | Statement: [Father and Son, reRecordingAlbum, Tea for the Tillerman²]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reRecordingAlbum Context triple: [Father and Son, reRecordingAlbum, Tea for the Tillerman²]
-
A.
hasRe-recording
chosen
Indicates that one recording is a new or updated version made again from the same original material or performance.
-
B.
reRecordingEra
Indicates that one recording is a new or updated version created in a later era relative to an earlier recording.
-
C.
isOnComebackAlbum
Indicates that an entity (such as a song or track) appears on an album that marks a return or resurgence for the artist after a period of reduced activity or absence.
-
D.
comebackAlbumFor
Indicates that one album serves as an artist’s return or resurgence release following a period of inactivity, decline, or absence.
-
E.
isReissueOfDebutAlbumBy
Indicates that one album is a reissued version of another artist’s debut album.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245fe24588190888f3aec8407d8e3 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1af68cddc8190ab9d0b7ee1f157ed |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:12 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f118bcc0b08190b25a8dddfd461a0e |
completed | April 28, 2026, 8:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:23 p.m.