Triple

T23558712
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Franklin Swift E579162 entity
Predicate relationshipTypeWithZoraBanks P152791 FINISHED
Object romantic partner LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: romantic partner | Statement: [Franklin Swift, relationshipTypeWithZoraBanks, romantic partner]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipTypeWithZoraBanks
Context triple: [Franklin Swift, relationshipTypeWithZoraBanks, romantic partner]
  • A. financialRelationshipWith
    Indicates a financial connection or association between entities, such as ownership, investment, funding, or other monetary ties.
  • B. connectsBank
    Indicates a relationship where one entity serves to link or provide access between another entity and a bank or banking service.
  • C. tributaryBank
    Indicates that one bank or financial institution is a subsidiary or dependent branch of another, larger or primary bank.
  • D. relationshipToStandingOrders
    Indicates the nature or status of an entity’s connection or applicability to existing standing orders.
  • E. trackBanking
    Indicates monitoring, recording, or managing banking-related activities or transactions associated with an entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245fe24588190888f3aec8407d8e3 completed April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1af6663e0819081d654da38cf3aa9 completed April 29, 2026, 7:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f118afabd88190bd88f49597d120e8 completed April 28, 2026, 8:29 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f121cc494081908c987adfcde89b0e completed April 28, 2026, 9:08 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:12 p.m.