Triple

T23556107
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Aegle E578189 entity
Predicate hasAromaticPart P152783 FINISHED
Object fruit rind LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: fruit rind | Statement: [Aegle, hasAromaticPart, fruit rind]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAromaticPart
Context triple: [Aegle, hasAromaticPart, fruit rind]
  • A. isAromatic
    Indicates that an entity possesses aromatic character, typically involving a conjugated ring system with delocalized electrons that confer special stability or scent-related properties.
  • B. hasCarbonHybridization
    Indicates the specific type of carbon atom hybridization (e.g., sp, sp2, sp3) associated with an entity in a molecular or chemical context.
  • C. hasChiralCenters
    Indicates that a molecule possesses one or more chiral (stereogenic) centers, leading to possible stereoisomerism.
  • D. lessAromaticThan
    Indicates that one entity has a lower degree of aromaticity than another entity.
  • E. usesHydrogenAtomDonor
    Indicates that one entity employs another entity as a source of hydrogen atoms (a hydrogen donor) in a chemical or biochemical process.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245fa93448190919cb04534560542 completed April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1aed37f248190992f040f4d22f0bf completed April 29, 2026, 7:10 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f118afabd88190bd88f49597d120e8 completed April 28, 2026, 8:29 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f121cc494081908c987adfcde89b0e completed April 28, 2026, 9:08 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:12 p.m.