Triple
T23552052
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | River of Deceit |
E578078
|
entity |
| Predicate | isIntrospective |
P115086
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [River of Deceit, isIntrospective, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isIntrospective Context triple: [River of Deceit, isIntrospective, true]
-
A.
hasIntrospectiveTone
chosen
Indicates that the subject expresses thoughts, feelings, or experiences in a reflective, inward-looking manner.
-
B.
supportsIntrospectionOf
Indicates that one entity enables or facilitates the examination or analysis of the internal state, structure, or behavior of another entity.
-
C.
isConceptuallyReflective
Indicates that one entity mirrors, represents, or echoes the ideas, structure, or meaning of another at a conceptual level.
-
D.
isInspected
Indicates that an entity is examined or checked by another entity to assess its condition, quality, or compliance.
-
E.
isIntense
Indicates that something exhibits a high degree of strength, force, or concentration in its quality, effect, or activity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245fa93448190919cb04534560542 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1aecf28508190b8d3396591e5e6bb |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f118afabd88190bd88f49597d120e8 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 8:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:11 p.m.