Triple
T23550743
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Soon Forget |
E578034
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesMinimalArrangement |
P152764
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Soon Forget, usesMinimalArrangement, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesMinimalArrangement Context triple: [Soon Forget, usesMinimalArrangement, true]
-
A.
isArrangementOf
Indicates that one entity is a specific ordering or configuration of the components or elements of another entity.
-
B.
canBeArrangedFor
Indicates that one entity is able to be scheduled, organized, or set up on behalf of or for the benefit of another entity.
-
C.
usesStringArrangement
Indicates that one entity employs or relies on a particular configuration or ordering of strings (such as text sequences or character arrays) to perform its function or achieve an outcome.
-
D.
hasArrangement
Indicates that one entity possesses, follows, or is organized according to a particular configuration, setup, or ordering defined by another entity.
-
E.
hasNotableArrangementFor
Indicates that one entity is distinguished by a significant or noteworthy arrangement, configuration, or setup specifically made for another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245fa93448190919cb04534560542 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1aece662081909022e7a29f966ca3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f118afabd88190bd88f49597d120e8 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 8:29 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f121cc494081908c987adfcde89b0e |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:11 p.m.