Triple
T23547884
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chanoines réguliers |
E577954
|
entity |
| Predicate | langueLiturgiqueHistorique |
P18499
|
FINISHED |
| Object | latin |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: latin | Statement: [Chanoines réguliers, langueLiturgiqueHistorique, latin]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: langueLiturgiqueHistorique Context triple: [Chanoines réguliers, langueLiturgiqueHistorique, latin]
-
A.
usesPrimaryLiturgicalLanguageHistorically
chosen
Indicates that an entity has historically used a particular primary liturgical language in its religious rites or worship practices.
-
B.
liturgicalLanguageVersion
Indicates that one entity is a specific version or form of another entity expressed in a particular liturgical language.
-
C.
liturgicalLanguageUsage
Indicates the relationship in which a particular language is used as the medium for conducting religious or liturgical rites, prayers, or ceremonies.
-
D.
historicalLanguage
Indicates that one language is a historical or earlier form/ancestor of another language.
-
E.
équivalentLiturgique
Indicates that two religious entities are considered liturgically equivalent, serving the same or an interchangeable role within liturgical practice.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245fa93448190919cb04534560542 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1aecc2af08190aec07cf9126d4e72 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f118afabd88190bd88f49597d120e8 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 8:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:11 p.m.