Triple
T23537536
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Yentl (songs) |
E577639
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAwardNominatedSong |
P35113
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Papa, Can You Hear Me? |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Papa, Can You Hear Me? | Statement: [Yentl (songs), hasAwardNominatedSong, Papa, Can You Hear Me?]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAwardNominatedSong Context triple: [Yentl (songs), hasAwardNominatedSong, Papa, Can You Hear Me?]
-
A.
nominatedSong
chosen
Indicates that a particular song has been put forward as a candidate for an award, recognition, or similar honor.
-
B.
grammyNomination
Indicates that an entity has been officially nominated for a Grammy Award in a particular category and year.
-
C.
hasNominatedPerformer
Indicates that an entity has put forward a performer as a nominee for an award, role, or recognition.
-
D.
numberOfGrammyNominations
Indicates the total count of Grammy Award nominations that an entity has received.
-
E.
albumAwardedTo
Indicates that a particular album has been granted or assigned to a specific recipient, such as an artist or group.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245f9d5d08190a4a20004e1784e20 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1ae1831688190ac06b84729bce160 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f118afabd88190bd88f49597d120e8 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 8:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:10 p.m.