Triple
T23533832
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Obelisk of Montecitorio |
E576638
|
entity |
| Predicate | brokenInPieces |
P18372
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Obelisk of Montecitorio, brokenInPieces, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: brokenInPieces Context triple: [Obelisk of Montecitorio, brokenInPieces, yes]
-
A.
brokenIn
Indicates that an object or system has become nonfunctional or damaged while located within or inside a particular place, context, or container.
-
B.
brokenUp
Indicates that a previously existing romantic or close relationship between two entities has ended.
-
C.
broken
chosen
Indicates that an entity is damaged or no longer functioning as intended, often as the result of some prior action or event.
-
D.
brokenUpAt
Indicates that a romantic or close relationship between two entities ended at a specific time or date.
-
E.
brokenBy
Indicates that one entity causes the damage, destruction, or loss of functionality of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245f5a8848190a2ba42e271c6c31f |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1ae14ae3c8190aa2714ea07a4658a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 7:07 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f1189d75b48190a1c01928a993c9fb |
completed | April 28, 2026, 8:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:10 p.m.