Triple
T23515764
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gloria |
E574360
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMysteriousConnectionWith |
P152691
|
FINISHED |
| Object | giant monster in Seoul |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: giant monster in Seoul | Statement: [Gloria, hasMysteriousConnectionWith, giant monster in Seoul]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMysteriousConnectionWith Context triple: [Gloria, hasMysteriousConnectionWith, giant monster in Seoul]
-
A.
hasSupernaturalConnectionWith
Indicates a special, non-natural bond or interaction exists between two entities that involves supernatural forces, powers, or phenomena.
-
B.
hasNotableConnectionTo
Indicates a significant or noteworthy relationship, association, or link exists between two entities.
-
C.
hasMysteriousPast
Indicates that an entity possesses a past that is unknown, hidden, or only partially revealed, often implying secrets or unexplained events.
-
D.
hasAllegedRelationshipWith
Indicates a claimed or suspected relationship between two entities that is not confirmed as factual.
-
E.
hasNotablePersonConnection
Indicates that there exists a significant or noteworthy personal, professional, or historical relationship between the subject and the referenced person.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245bb3dcc8190ba9a2b35972b58d0 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1aa81ab4c8190b85c8f80754020ea |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f0621165c08190a0b27b1319733959 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7:30 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f0bd4a0e408190ad8916faf23562d9 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 1:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:08 p.m.