Triple

T23514393
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Case of the Perjured Parrot E572515 entity
Predicate fictionalLawyer P152680 FINISHED
Object Perry Mason NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Perry Mason | Statement: [The Case of the Perjured Parrot, fictionalLawyer, Perry Mason]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fictionalLawyer
Context triple: [The Case of the Perjured Parrot, fictionalLawyer, Perry Mason]
  • A. legalFiction
    Indicates a relationship where something is treated as true or as having a particular legal status or effect, even though it is not literally or factually the case, for the purpose of applying or interpreting the law.
  • B. fictionalJurisdiction
    Indicates that one entity has legal authority or governance over another within an invented or imaginary legal system or territory.
  • C. fictionalPrisoner
    Indicates that an entity is portrayed as a prisoner within a fictional or narrative context.
  • D. fictionalSon
    Indicates that one entity is portrayed as the son of another entity within a fictional or narrative context.
  • E. fictionalField
    Indicates that the subject is associated with a fictional or imaginary field, domain, or area rather than a real-world one.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245b5e4208190bac8a6509867e394 completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1aa80d9048190ab735dddd301feb4 completed April 29, 2026, 6:51 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f0621165c08190a0b27b1319733959 completed April 28, 2026, 7:30 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f0bd4a0e408190ad8916faf23562d9 completed April 28, 2026, 1:59 p.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:08 p.m.