Triple

T23512689
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject John Barron E572468 entity
Predicate lawsuitResultedIn P30903 FINISHED
Object Barron v. Baltimore NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Barron v. Baltimore | Statement: [John Barron, lawsuitResultedIn, Barron v. Baltimore]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Barron v. Baltimore
Context triple: [John Barron, lawsuitResultedIn, Barron v. Baltimore]
  • A. Barron v. Baltimore chosen
    Barron v. Baltimore is an 1833 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Bill of Rights restricts only the federal government, not the states.
  • B. Benton v. Maryland
    Benton v. Maryland is a 1969 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Fifth Amendment’s protection against double jeopardy to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • C. Cooley v. Board of Wardens
    Cooley v. Board of Wardens is an 1852 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing states to regulate certain local aspects of commerce, such as port pilotage, without violating federal authority.
  • D. Bolling v. Sharpe
    Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
  • E. Yick Wo v. Hopkins
    Yick Wo v. Hopkins is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially discriminatory enforcement of a facially neutral law violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: lawsuitResultedIn
Context triple: [John Barron, lawsuitResultedIn, Barron v. Baltimore]
  • A. legalOutcome
    Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
  • B. legalCaseOutcomeAssociatedWith chosen
    Indicates that a particular legal case outcome is connected or linked to a specific related entity, such as a case, party, or legal proceeding.
  • C. legalCaseHeParticipatedInDecidedBy
    Indicates that a legal case in which he participated was decided or adjudicated by a specified authority or court.
  • D. legalConclusion
    Indicates that a situation, set of facts, or argument leads to or supports a specific determination or outcome under the law.
  • E. judgmentInvolves
    Indicates that a particular judgment, decision, or legal ruling includes, concerns, or pertains to a specified entity or matter.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245b5e4208190bac8a6509867e394 completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1aa7f583881909e78e8fe2e6e25fe completed April 29, 2026, 6:51 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f0621165c08190a0b27b1319733959 completed April 28, 2026, 7:30 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:07 p.m.