Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Adamson v. People of the State of California | Statement: [Adamson v. California, fullName, Adamson v. People of the State of California]

Target entity: Adamson v. People of the State of California
Context triple: [Adamson v. California, fullName, Adamson v. People of the State of California]

• A. Adamson v. California chosen
  Adamson v. California is a 1947 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refused to apply the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, later undermined by incorporation-era rulings.
• B. Hurtado v. California
  Hurtado v. California is an 1884 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause does not require states to use grand jury indictments in criminal prosecutions.
• C. Bridges v. California
  Bridges v. California is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly expanded First Amendment protections by limiting the power of courts to punish out-of-court publications as contempt.
• D. Navarette v. California
  Navarette v. California is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that an anonymous 911 tip about dangerous driving can provide reasonable suspicion to justify a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment.
• E. Griffin v. California
  Griffin v. California is a landmark 1965 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that prosecutors and judges may not comment on a criminal defendant’s failure to testify, as this violates the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.