Triple
T2350990
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 28 Weeks Later (cameo)? |
E47446
|
entity |
| Predicate | allegedAppearanceType |
P38676
|
FINISHED |
| Object | brief background appearance |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: brief background appearance | Statement: [28 Weeks Later (cameo)?, allegedAppearanceType, brief background appearance]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: allegedAppearanceType Context triple: [28 Weeks Later (cameo)?, allegedAppearanceType, brief background appearance]
-
A.
appearsAs
Indicates that one entity is presented, perceived, or manifested in the form, role, or guise of another entity.
-
B.
allegedStatus
Indicates that a particular status or condition is claimed or asserted about an entity, but has not been confirmed as true.
-
C.
appearsFor
Indicates that one entity is presented, shown, or made visible on behalf of, or in representation of, another entity.
-
D.
appearedWith
Indicates that two entities were present or participated together in the same context, event, or medium.
-
E.
appearsInLaw
Indicates that a legal concept, entity, or reference is mentioned or included within a specific law or legal document.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88a1b678c8190bce986922ba60ce0 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:38 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abcb802da08190980100444010f91e |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abc5981ce48190a3f7852d28276e11 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abcb7ebb708190ba7edffee3c45d8b |
completed | March 7, 2026, 6:53 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:54 p.m.