Triple

T23506485
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Proto-Sinitic E572293 entity
Predicate isHypothesizedBy P125813 FINISHED
Object comparative method LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: comparative method | Statement: [Proto-Sinitic, isHypothesizedBy, comparative method]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isHypothesizedBy
Context triple: [Proto-Sinitic, isHypothesizedBy, comparative method]
  • A. hypothesis
    Indicates that a statement or proposition is tentatively assumed to be true and is subject to testing, evaluation, or proof.
  • B. proposesHypothesis
    Indicates that one entity puts forward a tentative explanation or hypothesis for consideration regarding another entity or phenomenon.
  • C. exploresHypothesis
    Indicates that an entity actively investigates, tests, or examines a proposed hypothesis to understand its validity or implications.
  • D. hasCommonOriginHypothesis
    Indicates that there exists a hypothesis proposing a shared or common origin between the related entities.
  • E. basisOfHypothesis chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as the foundational evidence, rationale, or starting point for formulating a particular hypothesis about another entity or phenomenon.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245b5e4208190bac8a6509867e394 completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1a9009ca081908c4cffb8c32293ec completed April 29, 2026, 6:45 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f0621165c08190a0b27b1319733959 completed April 28, 2026, 7:30 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:07 p.m.