Triple
T23506307
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bodish languages |
E572290
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasMember |
P10
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Central Tibetan |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Central Tibetan | Statement: [Bodish languages, hasMember, Central Tibetan]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Central Tibetan Context triple: [Bodish languages, hasMember, Central Tibetan]
-
A.
Tibetan
Tibetan is a Sino-Tibetan language spoken primarily in Tibet and surrounding Himalayan regions, serving as the liturgical language of Tibetan Buddhism and a key marker of Tibetan cultural identity.
-
B.
Tibetic languages
chosen
Tibetic languages are a group of closely related Sino-Tibetan languages descended from Old Tibetan and spoken primarily across Tibet, Bhutan, Nepal, northern India, and surrounding Himalayan regions.
-
C.
Gyel dialect
The Gyel dialect is a regional variety of the Berom language spoken by the Berom people of central Nigeria.
-
D.
Zhaba Tibetan
Zhaba Tibetan is a Tibetic language variety spoken by the Zhaba people in parts of Sichuan, China.
-
E.
Tsongol dialect
The Tsongol dialect is a regional variety of the Mongolic languages spoken by Tsongol communities, preserving archaic features traceable to Proto-Mongolic.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b5e4208190bac8a6509867e394 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a9009ca081908c4cffb8c32293ec |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:07 p.m.