Triple
T23502541
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hamilton Hume |
E571888
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullName |
P16
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hamilton Hume |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hamilton Hume | Statement: [Hamilton Hume, fullName, Hamilton Hume]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hamilton Hume Context triple: [Hamilton Hume, fullName, Hamilton Hume]
-
A.
Hamilton Hume
chosen
Hamilton Hume was a pioneering Australian explorer best known for leading early overland expeditions that opened routes between Sydney and the southern regions of the continent.
-
B.
John Hindmarsh
John Hindmarsh was a British Royal Navy officer who became the first Governor of South Australia in the 19th century.
-
C.
Alan Cunningham
Alan Cunningham was a British Army general best known for leading Eighth Army forces in the North African campaign during World War II.
-
D.
John Oxley
John Oxley was an early 19th-century British explorer and surveyor of Australia, noted for his expeditions into the interior of New South Wales and Queensland.
-
E.
John Oxley
John Oxley was a 19th-century miller and landowner associated with the historic Alford Windmill in Lincolnshire, England.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b4829881909b77a70e942bbd54 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a8fe1e3081908c4a9df4e137b9b3 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:06 p.m.