Triple
T23500034
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Henry E. Brady |
E571813
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards | Statement: [Henry E. Brady, notableWork, Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards Context triple: [Henry E. Brady, notableWork, Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards]
-
A.
Rethinking Social Inquiry
chosen
Rethinking Social Inquiry is a methodological volume in political science that critiques and extends the quantitative, positivist approach of Designing Social Inquiry by advocating for pluralistic, case-based, and mixed-method research strategies.
-
B.
Designing Social Inquiry
Designing Social Inquiry is an influential methodological book in political science that sets out a unified framework for conducting rigorous qualitative and quantitative research in the social sciences.
-
C.
Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences
Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences is a foundational book by Jon Elster that systematically explains social phenomena through clear, mechanism-based explanations grounded in rational-choice and analytical approaches.
-
D.
Strength and Weakness of the Social Sciences
"Strength and Weakness of the Social Sciences" is a critical work by biologist and philosopher Gunther Stent that examines the methodological limits, explanatory power, and epistemological status of the social sciences in comparison to the natural sciences.
-
E.
The Methodology of the Social Sciences
The Methodology of the Social Sciences is a foundational work by Max Weber that articulates his influential theories on social science methodology, including concepts like ideal types, value neutrality, and the interpretive understanding of social action.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b4829881909b77a70e942bbd54 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a8fb71c08190a30500b3f63a9ce6 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:45 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:06 p.m.