Triple
T23497474
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Japanese law |
E571739
|
entity |
| Predicate | criminalProcedureFeature |
P25070
|
FINISHED |
| Object | lay judge system (saiban-in seido) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lay judge system (saiban-in seido) | Statement: [Japanese law, criminalProcedureFeature, lay judge system (saiban-in seido)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: criminalProcedureFeature Context triple: [Japanese law, criminalProcedureFeature, lay judge system (saiban-in seido)]
-
A.
legalProcedureUsed
Indicates that a particular legal procedure or process is applied or employed in relation to a case, action, or legal matter.
-
B.
legalSystemFeature
chosen
Indicates a characteristic, rule, or structural element that forms part of a particular legal system.
-
C.
courtCharacteristic
Indicates that a specified attribute or quality is associated with, or descriptive of, a particular court.
-
D.
courtFeatured
Indicates that a particular court prominently presented, highlighted, or showcased a given entity (such as a case, event, or person) in an official or notable context.
-
E.
requiredCourtProceeding
Indicates that a specific legal action or case must undergo a designated court proceeding or hearing.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b4829881909b77a70e942bbd54 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a7e0c5a48190badb8303f40f6180 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:40 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f0621165c08190a0b27b1319733959 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:05 p.m.