Triple

T23495987
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cheltenham Badlands E571705 entity
Predicate reasonForAccessRestriction P144709 FINISHED
Object protection of fragile geology LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: protection of fragile geology | Statement: [Cheltenham Badlands, reasonForAccessRestriction, protection of fragile geology]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reasonForAccessRestriction
Context triple: [Cheltenham Badlands, reasonForAccessRestriction, protection of fragile geology]
  • A. eligibilityRestrictedBy
    Indicates that an entity’s eligibility for something is limited, constrained, or conditioned by another specified factor or rule.
  • B. accessRestriction
    Indicates a limitation or control placed on who or what can access a particular resource, location, or information.
  • C. protectionReason
    Indicates the justification or cause for which protection is provided or required in the relationship between entities.
  • D. accessRestrictedTo
    Indicates that access to a resource, location, or information is limited exclusively to a specified entity or group under defined conditions.
  • E. accessPolicyReason chosen
    Indicates the justification or basis for granting, restricting, or defining an access policy between entities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e245b4829881909b77a70e942bbd54 completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1a7e00384819092729319a378d4ab completed April 29, 2026, 6:40 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f0621165c08190a0b27b1319733959 completed April 28, 2026, 7:30 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:05 p.m.