Triple
T23492721
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jordan–Syria water agreements |
E571619
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | transboundary water management arrangement |
C8918
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: transboundary water management arrangement Context triple: [Jordan–Syria water agreements, instanceOf, transboundary water management arrangement]
-
A.
water resources management agreement
chosen
A water resources management agreement is a formal arrangement between parties that defines rights, responsibilities, and coordinated actions for the sustainable allocation, use, protection, and monitoring of shared water resources.
-
B.
river basin management plan
A river basin management plan is a strategic framework that outlines coordinated actions, policies, and measures to sustainably manage water resources, ecosystems, land use, and human activities within a defined river basin.
-
C.
river basin organization
A river basin organization is an institutional body responsible for coordinating the management, development, and protection of water and related resources within a defined river basin across sectors and jurisdictions.
-
D.
cross-border lake
A cross-border lake is a body of water whose surface and/or basin is geographically shared and jointly influenced by two or more sovereign countries.
-
E.
transboundary region
A transboundary region is a geographically contiguous area that spans across the borders of two or more political or administrative jurisdictions, sharing interconnected environmental, economic, social, or cultural systems.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b4829881909b77a70e942bbd54 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:05 p.m.