Triple
T23490863
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Putah Creek Accord |
E570668
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | river restoration agreement |
C8918
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: river restoration agreement Context triple: [Putah Creek Accord, instanceOf, river restoration agreement]
-
A.
water resources management agreement
chosen
A water resources management agreement is a formal arrangement between parties that defines rights, responsibilities, and coordinated actions for the sustainable allocation, use, protection, and monitoring of shared water resources.
-
B.
river conservancy
River conservancy is the management and protection of river ecosystems through planning, regulation, restoration, and sustainable use to maintain their ecological health and benefits to society.
-
C.
restored waterway
A restored waterway is a previously degraded or altered river, stream, or canal that has been rehabilitated to improve its ecological function, water quality, and surrounding habitat while often enhancing recreational and aesthetic values.
-
D.
river basin management plan
A river basin management plan is a strategic framework that outlines coordinated actions, policies, and measures to sustainably manage water resources, ecosystems, land use, and human activities within a defined river basin.
-
E.
river commission
A river commission is an authoritative body responsible for managing, regulating, and coordinating the use, conservation, and development of a river and its surrounding resources, often across multiple jurisdictions.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b0b01481908f636939bedd804c |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:04 p.m.