Triple
T23485867
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 안익태 편곡 선율 |
E570530
|
entity |
| Predicate | 리듬 특징 |
P112024
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 4분의 4박자 기반의 행진곡적 성격 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 4분의 4박자 기반의 행진곡적 성격 | Statement: [안익태 편곡 선율, 리듬 특징, 4분의 4박자 기반의 행진곡적 성격]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: 리듬 특징 Context triple: [안익태 편곡 선율, 리듬 특징, 4분의 4박자 기반의 행진곡적 성격]
-
A.
featuresRhythm
chosen
Indicates that something includes, exhibits, or is characterized by a particular rhythmic pattern or structure.
-
B.
hasRhythmicStyle
Indicates that one entity exhibits or is characterized by a particular rhythmic pattern or style in its expression or behavior.
-
C.
rhythmicOrganization
Indicates how temporal patterns, accents, and durations are structured or arranged in relation to one another within a sequence or system.
-
D.
typicalTempoCharacterization
Indicates how the usual or characteristic tempo of something is described or classified.
-
E.
notableSongCharacteristic
Indicates that a song is distinguished by a particular notable feature or quality, such as style, structure, or performance trait.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e245b0b01481908f636939bedd804c |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a7538a8c8190b7effcc39a3f9787 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:38 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f0620ac3608190b36916261ea50f54 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 6:03 p.m.