Triple

T23462717
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dirac string E569023 entity
Predicate existsOnlyIn P84858 FINISHED
Object potential description, not in field strength LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: potential description, not in field strength | Statement: [Dirac string, existsOnlyIn, potential description, not in field strength]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: existsOnlyIn
Context triple: [Dirac string, existsOnlyIn, potential description, not in field strength]
  • A. existsOnlyAs chosen
    Indicates that the subject exists solely in a particular form, state, or context specified by the object, and not in any other.
  • B. existsAs
    Indicates that one entity has the same identity or manifestation as another, effectively asserting they are the same existing thing or state.
  • C. existsFor
    Indicates that something is present, available, or holds true for a particular entity, context, or condition.
  • D. existsWithin
    Indicates that one entity is located inside the spatial, temporal, or conceptual boundaries of another entity.
  • E. existsIf
    Indicates that the existence or validity of one entity or condition depends on the presence or truth of another specified condition.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2458ebd808190b3298163132cfb0b completed April 17, 2026, 2:37 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1a69cf7c48190b4d44e500f955b99 completed April 29, 2026, 6:35 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f06201d33481909b5fd7b92d03e658 completed April 28, 2026, 7:30 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:54 p.m.