Triple
T23459124
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Law of Clan MacDuff |
E568016
|
entity |
| Predicate | statusInModernLaw |
P14585
|
FINISHED |
| Object | obsolete |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: obsolete | Statement: [Law of Clan MacDuff, statusInModernLaw, obsolete]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: statusInModernLaw Context triple: [Law of Clan MacDuff, statusInModernLaw, obsolete]
-
A.
legalStatusModern
chosen
Indicates the current legal standing or classification of an entity under contemporary law or regulatory frameworks.
-
B.
statusInEnglishLaw
Indicates the legal standing, classification, or condition of something as defined within the framework of English law.
-
C.
stateOfLaw
Indicates that a specified legal condition, rule, or status is currently in force or applicable within a given jurisdiction or context.
-
D.
statusInLegalSystem
Indicates the current standing or condition of an entity within a legal or judicial framework (e.g., pending, active, resolved, or appealed).
-
E.
statusInScotsLaw
Indicates that one entity holds a particular legal status, classification, or standing under the rules and doctrines of Scots law in relation to the other entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2458b4c888190b1d7998f9862a558 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a699c0088190a84d7a495a3e3d61 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:35 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f06201d33481909b5fd7b92d03e658 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7:30 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:53 p.m.