Triple

T23456514
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ceecee E567937 entity
Predicate etymologicalRootOfFullName P108324 FINISHED
Object LatinCaeciliusViaCecilia LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: LatinCaeciliusViaCecilia | Statement: [Ceecee, etymologicalRootOfFullName, LatinCaeciliusViaCecilia]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: etymologicalRootOfFullName
Context triple: [Ceecee, etymologicalRootOfFullName, LatinCaeciliusViaCecilia]
  • A. etymologicalRootName chosen
    Indicates that one name is derived from, or originates etymologically in, another name.
  • B. hasSurnameEthymology
    Indicates that an entity’s surname originates from, or is derived based on, a specified source, language, or etymological root.
  • C. patronymicOrigin
    Indicates that one entity’s name is derived from the name of a father or paternal ancestor of another entity.
  • D. nameEtymologyFor
    Indicates that one entity expresses or explains the origin or derivation of the name of another entity.
  • E. hasNameEtymologyIn
    Indicates that the origin or derivation of an entity’s name is based in, or traceable to, a specified source such as a language, place, or cultural context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e2458b4c888190b1d7998f9862a558 completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1a6980d4481909fab47cb5bd28eab completed April 29, 2026, 6:35 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f06201d33481909b5fd7b92d03e658 completed April 28, 2026, 7:30 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:53 p.m.