Triple

T23442656
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject H. Jon Benjamin as Bob Belcher E565443 entity
Predicate characterCatchphraseType P112889 FINISHED
Object exasperatedRemarks LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: exasperatedRemarks | Statement: [H. Jon Benjamin as Bob Belcher, characterCatchphraseType, exasperatedRemarks]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: characterCatchphraseType
Context triple: [H. Jon Benjamin as Bob Belcher, characterCatchphraseType, exasperatedRemarks]
  • A. characterCatchphrase
    Indicates that a particular phrase is commonly and distinctively used by a character as their catchphrase.
  • B. notableCatchphraseUser
    Indicates that the subject is a person who is notably associated with using a particular catchphrase.
  • C. hasCatchphraseStyle chosen
    Indicates that an entity’s catchphrase conforms to, or is characterized by, a particular stylistic pattern or manner of expression.
  • D. hasCatchphraseStatus
    Indicates whether an entity’s phrase or expression holds the status of being recognized as a catchphrase.
  • E. featuresCatchphrase
    Indicates that an entity prominently includes or is associated with a particular catchphrase.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69e24584f9488190bb32730bd2ce023e completed April 17, 2026, 2:36 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f1a64654e88190b530958b27b32412 completed April 29, 2026, 6:33 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f061f92da081908e7f1d0cd1e9b01c completed April 28, 2026, 7:30 a.m.
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:51 p.m.