Triple
T23418250
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gundestrup cauldron |
E560571
|
entity |
| Predicate | debatedOrigin |
P57127
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Thracian craftsmanship hypothesis |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Thracian craftsmanship hypothesis | Statement: [Gundestrup cauldron, debatedOrigin, Thracian craftsmanship hypothesis]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: debatedOrigin Context triple: [Gundestrup cauldron, debatedOrigin, Thracian craftsmanship hypothesis]
-
A.
debatedBetween
Indicates a situation in which two or more parties engage in a discussion or argument over differing views about a particular issue or topic.
-
B.
debatedAs
Indicates that one entity is discussed or argued over in terms of being equivalent to, or serving in the role of, another entity within a debate or comparative argument.
-
C.
hasSourceOfDebate
Indicates that something is the origin or cause of an ongoing disagreement, controversy, or dispute between parties.
-
D.
originDebatedInCanon
Indicates that the character’s or entity’s origin story is discussed with conflicting or unresolved explanations within the official canon.
-
E.
debatedWithin
chosen
Indicates that something is discussed or argued about within a particular group, context, or domain.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2454cb1108190ab21ada5411a7146 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a5438ac08190a40a3d6402794699 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f061ed34288190a2e5e8cae03b0095 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7:29 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:39 p.m.