Triple
T23416585
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Iacobus Minor |
E560523
|
entity |
| Predicate | epithetIndicates |
P121211
|
FINISHED |
| Object | distinction from James the Greater |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: distinction from James the Greater | Statement: [Iacobus Minor, epithetIndicates, distinction from James the Greater]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: epithetIndicates Context triple: [Iacobus Minor, epithetIndicates, distinction from James the Greater]
-
A.
epithetAppliedBy
Indicates that a particular epithet or descriptive label is used or assigned by a specific agent to a target entity.
-
B.
epithetScope
Indicates that an epithet (a descriptive label or phrase) applies specifically within a defined contextual scope or domain for the referenced entity or relation.
-
C.
hasMeaningOfEpithet
Indicates that one entity expresses or conveys the meaning or sense of another entity’s epithet.
-
D.
epithetOrTitle
Indicates that one entity serves as an epithet, honorific, or formal title used to designate or characterize another entity.
-
E.
associatedWithEpithet
chosen
Indicates that an entity is linked to or described by a particular epithet or descriptive label.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e2454cb1108190ab21ada5411a7146 |
completed | April 17, 2026, 2:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a515fe048190adefdefaeff76cfd |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f061ed34288190a2e5e8cae03b0095 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7:29 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:39 p.m.