Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Scramble for Concessions in China | Statement: [Russian lease of Liaodong Peninsula, relatedEvent, Scramble for Concessions in China]

Target entity: Scramble for Concessions in China
Context triple: [Russian lease of Liaodong Peninsula, relatedEvent, Scramble for Concessions in China]

• A. Scramble for concessions in China chosen
  The Scramble for concessions in China was a late 19th-century period when major foreign powers aggressively carved out spheres of influence and secured special rights in China, undermining Chinese sovereignty and setting the stage for later international policies like the Open Door policy.
• B. China Wakes: The Struggle for the Soul of a Rising Power
  "China Wakes: The Struggle for the Soul of a Rising Power" is a nonfiction book by journalists Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn that offers an in-depth, on-the-ground portrait of China's political, social, and economic transformation in the late 20th century.
• C. Trouble in China
  Trouble in China is a non-fiction work by Canadian broadcaster and journalist Gordon Sinclair that examines political and social conditions in China.
• D. The China Mirage
  The China Mirage is a historical nonfiction book by James Bradley that examines the complex and often misguided American perceptions and policies toward China from the late 19th century through World War II.
• E. American concession in Shanghai
  The American concession in Shanghai was a foreign-controlled enclave established by the United States in 19th-century Shanghai that later merged into the larger Shanghai International Settlement.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.