Triple

T2339451
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Andrew the Apostle E44389 entity
Predicate traditionalMannerOfDeath P38327 FINISHED
Object crucifixion LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: crucifixion | Statement: [Andrew the Apostle, traditionalMannerOfDeath, crucifixion]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: traditionalMannerOfDeath
Context triple: [Andrew the Apostle, traditionalMannerOfDeath, crucifixion]
  • A. allegedMannerOfDeath
    Indicates that the specified manner of death is claimed or reported for an entity, but not confirmed as factual.
  • B. traditionallyDiedIn
    Indicates that, according to tradition or customary accounts (rather than strictly verified historical evidence), one entity is said to have died in the location or context of another entity.
  • C. causeOfDeath
    Indicates the specific factor, event, or condition that directly resulted in an entity’s death.
  • D. deathApprox
    Indicates that an entity’s death occurred at an approximate, rather than exact, time or date.
  • E. hasMannerOfDeathOfVictim
    Indicates the specific way or circumstances in which the victim died in relation to the event or action being described.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a889132b488190bbb43ad4780ddd92 completed March 4, 2026, 7:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abc6f75d888190a2e41edaa532e83f completed March 7, 2026, 6:34 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abc594087c819098100a10c5478a4b completed March 7, 2026, 6:28 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69abc6f4245881909282b3184a288e2a completed March 7, 2026, 6:34 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:51 p.m.