Triple
T23387908
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chakma script |
E593932
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPhonographicType |
P152056
|
FINISHED |
| Object | segmental writing system |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: segmental writing system | Statement: [Chakma script, hasPhonographicType, segmental writing system]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPhonographicType Context triple: [Chakma script, hasPhonographicType, segmental writing system]
-
A.
hasPhonologicalType
Indicates that one entity is characterized by or classified as having a particular phonological type (e.g., in terms of sound structure or phonological category).
-
B.
phonographicType
Indicates the specific kind or category of phonographic recording or medium associated with an entity.
-
C.
hasPhoneme
Indicates that a linguistic unit (such as a word or morpheme) contains or includes a particular phoneme as part of its sound structure.
-
D.
hasProsodicType
Indicates that one entity is characterized by a particular prosodic pattern or category (such as stress, intonation, or rhythm type) in relation to another.
-
E.
isPhonetic
Indicates that one entity represents the phonetic (sound-based) form or pronunciation of another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d2754fc819085deea939bde60ab |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a499bad88190afca1afb2e3fddb0 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:26 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f061dde2e481908308952f9c0d3c2e |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7:29 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f07cbbd7488190ab3c8ae7d0fb68bf |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:35 p.m.