Triple
T23387507
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PUA-A |
E593923
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasStabilityPolicy |
P67784
|
FINISHED |
| Object | code points will never be assigned standard characters |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: code points will never be assigned standard characters | Statement: [PUA-A, hasStabilityPolicy, code points will never be assigned standard characters]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasStabilityPolicy Context triple: [PUA-A, hasStabilityPolicy, code points will never be assigned standard characters]
-
A.
stabilityPolicy
chosen
Indicates that a policy defines or influences the conditions under which a system, process, or arrangement remains stable over time.
-
B.
hasStabilityLevel
Indicates that something possesses a particular degree or state of stability, often quantified or categorized along a defined scale.
-
C.
hasStabilityIndex
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific measure or score representing its level of stability.
-
D.
haveStabilityDeterminedBy
Indicates that the stability of one entity is determined or governed by another specified factor or entity.
-
E.
hasPolicyStatus
Indicates that an entity is associated with a policy and specifies the current status or state of that policy.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d2754fc819085deea939bde60ab |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a498fd08819085e90a872d9d0c7a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:26 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f061dde2e481908308952f9c0d3c2e |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7:29 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:35 p.m.