Triple
T23382254
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Irancy |
E593778
|
entity |
| Predicate | alsoUsesGrapeVariety |
P152021
|
FINISHED |
| Object | César |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: César | Statement: [Irancy, alsoUsesGrapeVariety, César]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: alsoUsesGrapeVariety Context triple: [Irancy, alsoUsesGrapeVariety, César]
-
A.
grapeVarietyType
Indicates the specific type or classification of a grape variety used or referred to in a given context.
-
B.
primaryGrapeVariety
Indicates that one entity is the main or predominant grape variety used in producing the other entity (typically a wine or wine-based product).
-
C.
developedGrapeVariety
Indicates that an agent (such as a breeder, institution, or person) created or bred a particular grape variety.
-
D.
traditionalGrapeVariety
Indicates that a grape variety is traditionally or historically used in a specific region, wine style, or cultural winemaking practice.
-
E.
grapeVarietyAllowed
Indicates that a specific grape variety is permitted or authorized for use in a given context, such as a wine, region, or product specification.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69e25d268a50819095f2fd479da8ef3f |
completed | April 17, 2026, 4:17 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f1a3b9287481908fd86c41f6d9fc53 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 6:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f061dde2e481908308952f9c0d3c2e |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7:29 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f07cbbd7488190ab3c8ae7d0fb68bf |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m. |
Created at: April 17, 2026, 5:34 p.m.